I've been flowing the local papers in my hometown and the debate on starting a foreign language a year earlier; starting it in 8
th grade instead of 9
th.
When talking about it to my mom, who works for a neighboring school district, she posed two questions, what difference does a year make and in this economy are districts really going to foot for extra teachers? Granted, a year is not that big of a difference, but if you can peak a students interest in an area earlier, why not? The bigger issue should be starting a foreign language in elementary school. I babysit for some children who attend a private school. The nine year old is fluent in French and can hold a conversation in that language-all learning done at school. Neither of her parents speak French. And to argue the second point, being bilingual would make a student stand out in job interviews over another candidate. I understand that the economy is difficult at this time but if starting languages earlier in students education is for their benefit in their future, why wouldn't find ways to make that happen?
My ending comparison was, we teach students to be computer and technology literate at very young ages, which is crucial whether a student pursues their education or goes directly into the workforce. How is integrating language into cirriculum at an earlier age any different?